Modeling a real transformer: why is the excitation branch in parallel?

by Eliza   Last Updated October 09, 2019 18:25 PM

enter image description here

In the above diagram, the parallel branch containing Rc and jXm represents the excitation branch.

My question: I just can't seem to understand why the core loss current and the magnetization current had to be modeled using a parallel branch?



Answers 2


If you didn't connect anything to the secondary you would just have, in effect, an inductor formed by the primary. If you measured the inductance (for instance) you would get a few henries for a standard AC power transformer.

That measurement implies the inductance is in parallel with the primary connections. It's a big value inductance of course because you don't want massive reactive currents being taken by electronic appliances or the electicity companies would be up in arms about it. So that's why a regular AC transformer has up to a 1000 primary turns.

So, if that big inductance were in series with the "ideal" transformer in the transformer model, you would, at best get a few tens or maybe a hundred milli amps into the primary on full load on the secondary and that doesn't make a very good transformer.

To double check this, think again about it being in series with the ideal transformer in the model. Now, with the secondary unloaded there would be absolutely zero reactive current into the primary and this is just not the case.

Andy aka
Andy aka
March 25, 2016 10:23 AM

yo wtf is going on here my dog

yomamama
yomamama
October 09, 2019 18:00 PM

Related Questions


Updated January 23, 2018 16:25 PM

Updated September 09, 2017 17:25 PM

Updated May 14, 2015 03:10 AM

Updated April 24, 2018 13:25 PM

Updated April 09, 2018 01:25 AM